The 4% rule says you can withdraw 4% of your portfolio annually and your money should last 30 years. With $500K, that's $20,000/year or $1,667/month.
Somewhere around 1998, three professors at Trinity University in Texas published a paper that changed how millions of Americans think about retirement. They didn't invent a complicated formula or a proprietary system. They just asked a simple question: if you withdraw a fixed percentage of your savings each year, adjusted for inflation, how often does your money survive 30 years?
The answer, across nearly every historical period they tested, was that 4% worked. Not always. Not perfectly. But reliably enough that the "4% rule" became the single most cited guideline in retirement planning. And if you've got $500,000 saved up and you're wondering whether that's enough — this is where the math starts.
What Is the 4% Rule?
The concept comes from what's now called the Trinity Study, formally published as "Retirement Savings: Choosing a Withdrawal Rate That Is Sustainable." Professors Philip Cooley, Carl Hubbard, and Daniel Walz analyzed rolling 30-year periods of stock and bond market returns dating back to 1926. They wanted to know what withdrawal rate gave retirees a high probability of not running out of money.
Here's how it works in practice. You take your total portfolio value on the day you retire. You withdraw 4% of that number in your first year. Every year after that, you increase the dollar amount by the rate of inflation. So if you start with $500,000 and withdraw $20,000 in year one, and inflation runs 3%, you'd withdraw $20,600 in year two. Then $21,218 in year three. And so on.
The withdrawal amount is pegged to your starting balance, not your current balance. That distinction matters. Even if the market drops 20% in year two, you don't recalculate from the lower number. You stick to the original $20,000 baseline, adjusted for inflation. This consistency is part of what makes the math work over long periods — you're not panic-adjusting during downturns.
The $500,000 Example
Let's put real numbers on this. If you retire with a $500,000 portfolio and follow the 4% rule, your first year withdrawal is $20,000 — that's $1,667 per month before taxes. Not life-changing money on its own, but combined with Social Security, a pension, or part-time work, it can be a solid foundation.
How does this scale across different portfolio sizes?
Those monthly numbers don't include Social Security, which averaged $1,907/month for retired workers in 2024. Add that to a $500K portfolio's withdrawals and you're looking at roughly $3,574/month combined. For many retirees, especially those in lower-cost areas or with a paid-off mortgage, that's a workable number.
Want to understand how this withdrawal strategy fits into a broader retirement income plan? The 4% rule works best as one layer in a multi-source income approach, not the entire plan.
Will $500K Actually Last 30 Years?
The Trinity Study found that a 4% withdrawal rate with a 50/50 stock-bond allocation had roughly a 95% success rate over 30-year periods. That sounds reassuring, and mostly it is. But that 5% failure rate isn't theoretical — it represents real historical periods where retirees would've run out of money.
Several factors determine whether your specific $500K survives three decades:
- Asset allocation: Portfolios with higher stock exposure (60–75%) historically performed better than bond-heavy portfolios. Stocks provide growth that offsets inflation. Going all-bonds sounds safe but actually increases the risk of running out of money over 30 years because returns can't keep pace with rising costs.
- Inflation rate: The 4% rule assumes you'll adjust withdrawals for inflation annually. During periods of low inflation (2010s), that's barely noticeable. During periods like the late 1970s when inflation topped 13%, those annual increases eat into your portfolio significantly faster.
- Market conditions in early years: This is the big one. If you retire right before a major market crash, your portfolio takes a hit at the worst possible time — while you're simultaneously making withdrawals. More on this below.
- Actual spending patterns: Most retirees don't spend the same amount every year for 30 years. Spending tends to be higher in early retirement (travel, activities), drops in middle retirement, and may spike again later due to healthcare costs.
When the 4% Rule Breaks Down
The rule isn't bulletproof. Understanding where it fails helps you avoid the scenarios that could actually drain your savings.
Sequence of Returns Risk
This is the biggest threat to a 4% withdrawal strategy. If the market drops 30% in your first or second year of retirement, you're withdrawing from a significantly smaller portfolio. Even when markets recover, you've already pulled out dollars that can't participate in the rebound. Two retirees with identical portfolios and identical withdrawal rates can have wildly different outcomes purely based on whether they retired in 1999 (bad sequence) or 2002 (much better sequence).
Extended High Inflation
The inflation adjustment built into the 4% rule works fine during normal periods. But sustained high inflation — think 6–8% annually for several consecutive years — forces your withdrawals up faster than most portfolios can grow. The 2022–2023 inflation spike reminded a lot of retirees that this risk isn't just academic.
Early Retirement
The Trinity Study tested 30-year periods. If you retire at 65, that covers you to 95. But retire at 50? Now you need 40 or 45 years of income. The 4% rule wasn't designed for that timeline. A 50-year-old retiree probably needs to use 3% or even 2.5% to ensure the portfolio survives that long. The math gets tighter the earlier you step away from earned income.
Reality Check
The 4% rule was designed for 30-year retirement periods. Retiring at 40? You might need 3% or less. That drops your $500K withdrawal from $20,000/year to $15,000/year — a meaningful difference. Early retirees need a fundamentally different strategy than traditional retirees. Don't force a 30-year rule onto a 50-year timeline.
Adjusting the Rule for Your Situation
The original 4% guideline is a starting point, not a law. Smart retirees adjust based on their circumstances. Here's how different withdrawal rates change the picture for a $500,000 portfolio:
Which rate should you pick? It depends on a few things. If you have guaranteed income (pension, Social Security) covering your essential expenses, you can afford to be more aggressive with portfolio withdrawals because you won't need to sell during downturns. If the portfolio is your primary income source, lean conservative — 3.5% gives you a much bigger cushion for bad markets.
Flexibility matters too. If you can cut spending by 10–15% during a bear market, a 4.5% initial rate becomes much safer. It's the rigid spenders — those who can't or won't reduce withdrawals during downturns — who run into trouble.
Pro Tip: Combine Withdrawals with Dividend Income
Instead of selling shares to fund your retirement, build a portfolio that generates dividend income covering part of your spending needs. A $500K portfolio yielding 3% produces $15,000 in dividends alone. You'd only need to sell $5,000 in shares to hit a 4% withdrawal rate. This approach reduces the damage of selling during market dips because the dividends keep flowing regardless of share prices.
Beyond the 4% Rule
Financial planners have spent decades building on the Trinity Study's foundation. If straight 4% withdrawals feel too rigid, these alternatives offer more nuance.
The Bucket Strategy
Divide your portfolio into three buckets: short-term (1–2 years of expenses in cash), medium-term (3–7 years in bonds), and long-term (everything else in stocks). You spend from the cash bucket first, refilling it from bonds during normal markets and leaving stocks untouched during downturns. This approach removes the emotional pressure of selling stocks at a loss just to pay the electric bill.
Dynamic Withdrawals
Instead of a fixed percentage, adjust your withdrawal rate each year based on portfolio performance. After a strong year, withdraw a bit more. After a down year, tighten the belt. Research from Jonathan Guyton and William Klinger showed that dynamic rules — with guardrails preventing withdrawals from going too high or too low — can support higher initial withdrawal rates with similar safety margins.
The Floor-and-Ceiling Approach
Set a minimum withdrawal (your floor — enough for essentials) and a maximum (your ceiling — your ideal spending). Withdraw at the ceiling when markets cooperate. Drop to the floor when they don't. This gives you a structured way to flex spending without guessing. For $500K, your floor might be $16,000/year and your ceiling $24,000/year.
If you're building toward retirement rather than already in it, our guide on making $1,000/month passively covers strategies for accelerating your savings rate before you reach the withdrawal phase.
Making $500K Work for You
Half a million dollars isn't what it used to be, but it's far from nothing. Paired with Social Security, strategic withdrawal rates, and a willingness to stay flexible, $500K can sustain a comfortable — if not extravagant — retirement for 30 years or more.
The key isn't memorizing a rule. It's understanding the principles behind it: withdraw conservatively, stay invested in growth assets, adjust when markets demand it, and don't lock yourself into a rigid plan that can't survive a recession.
Start with 4%. Watch the markets. Stay flexible. And remember that the retirees who run out of money aren't the ones who withdrew too little in good years. They're the ones who couldn't cut back during the bad ones.
Plan Your Retirement Income
Get weekly strategies on building sustainable retirement income, withdrawal planning, and portfolio management.